Hot IT Jobs

Sr. SAP FI/CO Enterprise Specialist (III)

Developer

3rd shift Computer Operator

Ab Initio Consultant in Tampa, FL

Software Engineer

 

 

 


Features

March 2009


Cloud computing

Four issues of e-mail continuity

Administrators should carefully weigh economical solutions.

by John Liccione

With the advent of cloud computing e-mail offerings, coupled with e-mail synchronization technologies, enterprises are considering cloud computing for low-cost e-mail continuity and disaster recovery. When coupled with state-of-the-art replication software to maintain real-time synchronization and protection, cloud computing can ensure enterprise users can continue to send, receive and archive e-mail if Exchange goes down.

Traditionally, enterprises seeking reduced disaster recovery times for their internal Microsoft Exchange corporate e-mail systems (and other critical data) have deployed a separate disaster recovery site with dedicated server hardware, recovery software and network connectivity. This approach, however, can be expensive. Acquiring, deploying and maintaining a remote set of servers and network-access infrastructure adds costs and an additional burden on the IT staff.

When considering cloud computing service providers for e-mail continuity, an organization should first analyze the following key issues:

Corporate controls: In order to ensure proper control, security and corporate governance, the IT department should procure and assume the remote management, provisioning and policy for the outsourced e-mail continuity environment. Do not leave it to the individual user to configure and manage free accounts or individual outsourced accounts. The IT department should pilot and contract with the provider for relevant services. The IT administrator also can configure, deploy and remotely manage the outsourced domain accounts in the cloud via the provider’s administrative user interface. Settings for retention, archiving and access should be managed like any other corporate IT resource. The IT department should be acquainted with the granularity of control offered by the provider over domain-level and user-level accounts and determine whether it is adequate given the cost savings.

Mailbox sizes: Determine the mailbox size required and the cost involved. Microsoft’s Exchange online mailboxes can be provisioned with up to 4 GB out of the box. Larger mailboxes can be provisioned for an extra fee. Google Apps Premier Accounts come with 25 GB of mailbox storage.

Service uptime: Evaluate uptime guarantees to ensure the best possible continuity and disaster recovery scenarios. Both Microsoft and Google offer up to 99.9 percent-availability service-level agreements (SLA), but the penalties for failing to meet the SLA in a given month do not have the teeth that other service providers offer the enterprise customer.

Mobile/wireless user support: Consider mobile users and how e-mail continuity is maintained for mobile devices in the event of an Exchange outage or a full site outage. Each provider treats wireless e-mail/contact/calendar synchronization differently, and the pros and cons of each should be considered. Microsoft, for example, can support BlackBerry sync for all Exchange data types for a fee, whereas Google Apps offers only calendar and contact sync to the BlackBerry, not e-mail.

John Liccione is chief technology officer, Cemaphore Systems, San Mateo, Calif.

For more information (click here)


Comments

Add a Comment
Comments will be proofed by editorial before being posted live. This may take up to one business day.
Name


Email Address


Type comment here: