Building Automation
Integrate automation of facilities
Consolidating the command and control of disparate functions can simplify the operator's experience.
by David Heinen
Many buildings today
contain a wide assortment of technologyfrom
electronic equipment for access control,
video surveillance, fire and intrusion
detection to heating, cooling, energy
management and lighting systemsall designed
to maintain and protect the physical
structure and secure its occupants and
assets. Running and monitoring these systems
is time consuming, costly and often poses a
significant challenge for organizations,
especially those with buildings in various
geographic locations.

For security and life safety systems, IP technology delivers a common language, where devices and systems can work together.
Managing the multiple
screens and interfaces of these systems can
also take its toll on employees, resulting
in slower response times during an incident.
The reaction time of a security officer or
facilities employee can often be impeded by
the need to manually process information
from these isolated systems.
As a result, building
owners and facility and IT managers are
investigating systems that can monitor the
health of an entire structure or campus
environment, and manufacturers are
responding by producing tools to bring
together these multiple components onto a
single platform. A building integration
system that encompasses an entire facility
or multiple locations across diverse
geographies can streamline complicated
processes and serve as a management
dashboard for operators.
The ability to
consolidate the command and control of these
disparate functions into a single platform
with an integrated graphical user interface
can simplify the operator's experience,
speed reaction times and result in action
plans that are more appropriate and targeted
to specific situations. A well-thought-out
action plan tells the operator what to do,
how to do it and delivers the details
required to complete the response correctly,
the first time.
With an integrated
system, communication between the various
functions becomes automatic. For example,
when the fire alarm is pulled on the sixth
floor of a 12-story office building,
emergency exits are instantly unlocked on
all levels, and the voice evacuation system
delivers clear instructions, specific to
each floor or zone, on exiting the building.
If the fire alarm system is alerted of
smoke, the air handling software immediately
powers down fans to avoid spreading smoke
throughout the building.
AUTOMATED RESPONSE STEPS
If an alarm is raised in
a specific area of a building, signifying a
possible intruder, an integrated system can
automatically bring forth the predetermined
action plan for such events and zoom in on a
graphical map of the affected area. The
graphical maps typically originate from the
AutoCAD drawings used in the building design
and/or construction.
Other associated files,
such as video or images of the area, or
documents detailing any hazardous chemicals
stored onsite and how to handle them
properly, can also be brought to the
operator's attention. If the operator does
not acknowledge the alarm in a certain
amount of time, the system can forward the
message to the next authorized responder.
Once the incident has been handled, an event
log can be created that reports the actions
the operator took while processing the
alarm.
Efficiencies can also be
achieved in non-emergency situations. On top
of notifying proper personnel whenever there
is a system malfunction, environmental and
lighting controls, tied into the building's
access-control system, can link the use of
heating, cooling and lighting to occupancy
of a particular room or zone, instead of
more traditional scheduled changes. This
approach ties energy use to need, such as
turning on the lights and HVAC system when
an employee enters a certain area, instead
of using regular schedules that may or may
not reflect the actual behavior of building
occupants.
Combining access control
with video surveillance is another example
of the power of integrated systems. For
instance, security directors can enhance
their access control for particularly
sensitive areas of a facility by setting
card readers for video verification of the
person requesting access. When a person
presents credentials to the reader, her
recorded photo image is displayed on the
operator's screen for comparison to the live
image from nearby cameras. The operator then
unlocks the door after confirming the
authenticity of the cardholder's identity.
For security and life
safety systems, IP technology delivers a
common language, where devices and systems
can work together and allow for the
integration of other building control
functions. Getting the most accurate,
up-to-date information from an integrated
system, however, does not happen simply
because the pieces are networked. The
technology that supports the standards
necessary for integration need to be ensured
in order to achieve comprehensive building
management. With Web server applications and
standards such as BACnet, LON and OPC, many
manufacturers have eliminated the
technological roadblocks to achieve
automation.
Bidirectional
communications between subsystems also helps
ensure that exchanges between hardware and
software occur as quickly as possible. This
is paramount in an emergency when decisions
are made based on snapshot assessments of
the situation.
The transfer of
application-related information between
systems is accomplished with a single
underlying database, as maintaining one
database is easier and results in more
accurate information. System communication
should be automatic and instantaneous. For
example, updates to human resource
information when employees are hired or
leave the company should, by design, also be
made to the access-control system. A delay
of hours or even minutes could provide a
disgruntled employee the opportunity to
damage company property.
A unified look for alarms
and alerts from all systems (e.g., access
control, video surveillance, fire alarms)
allows for a more consistent response from
facility officers and reduces training time
for operators.
REVIEW BUSINESS NEEDS FIRST
Just because the
capability is available does not mean
full-scale integration is appropriate for
every enterprise. Each integration project
should begin with a thorough discussion of
the organization's business needs and goals.
Also important is to
engage all stakeholders early in the
planning, design and bid stage of the
project. If other groups within the
organization, such as human resources or
legal personnel, are expected to review
recorded video or be involved in response
and action plans, their input should be
gathered during the initial design stages.
This communication and
definition of requirements will help ensure
a full understanding of the ultimate goal of
the system and the impact to the business
environment. In most cases, if all of these
items are considered, a system can be
designed that can scale as the organization
grows or as it seeks to expand system
capabilities.
Once the goals of the
system are determined, and the search begins
for manufacturers and integrators, there are
a number of factors to consider.
Look for technology
providers that have built simplicity into
the installation process, such as templates
for predefined response action plans, easy
configuration menus and information
import/export tools that use common file
formats. The system should also allow for
manual triggering of an alarm in case the
operator is alerted of a possible dangerous
situation.
Scalable and modular
systems may be more appropriate if a phased
approach is planned in order to spread the
costs and integration work over a period of
time. Readily available training and
technical support, during an installation
and after completion, is also paramount for
these types of complex systems.
When chosen and designed
carefully, a building integration system
that offers automation through IP technology
can achieve significant efficiencies in
staffing requirements and energy costs.
While the acquisition cost for the equipment
and the labor rates for any involved
integrators can range anywhere from the tens
of thousands to millions of dollars,
depending on the size and complexity of the
system, the resulting cost and productivity
savings can more than pay for this expense
over time.
David Heinen is product marketing manager, enterprise systems, Bosch Security Systems, Fairport, N.Y.
For more information
(click here)