Business Continuity
Appliances prevent e-mail downtime
Other business-continuity solutions
for MS Exchange may be more costly and
complex.
by Andréa Skov
According to Gartner Group, 80 percent of
business people say they consider e-mail
more valuable than the phone for business
communications. Gartner also estimates,
however, that most small and midsized
enterprises experience more than 40 total
hours of unplanned e-mail downtime each
year, which can translate into significant
financial losses.

E-mail has
fundamentally changed the way business is
conducted, and reliance on this pervasive
form of electronic communication is only
expected to grow.
E-mail has
fundamentally changed the way business is
conducted, and reliance on this pervasive
form of electronic communication is only
expected to grow with the spread of mobile
devices for business uses. Meanwhile,
solutions to the e-mail downtime challenge
may not be obvious. Is affordable five-nines
e-mail uptime possible? Can downtime of any
kind be preventedeven for routine
maintenance?
The good news is that IT pros looking for
reliable and cost-effective e-mail
continuity solutions have a number of
options. The most common e-mail continuity
solutions in the market today are for
Microsoft Exchange, falling into the
following categories: Microsoft clusters,
software replication solutions, hosted
disaster recovery and remotely managed
failover appliances.
Clustering, in which a group of servers,
as few as two, work to protect each other,
can be used for a variety of applications,
not just e-mail. Their downside is their
normal complexity and expense to set up and
maintain. Clusters require additional
servers to be installed, set up and synced
with the primary e-mail server. All of the
servers in a cluster must be maintained at
the same patch and revision level as the
primary server, so the ongoing maintenance
burden is increased. Furthermore, ongoing
maintenance requires cluster-certified IT
staff.
Software replication solutions are
software-only packages, often requiring
additional servers, operating systems and
application software to clone the primary
server. The operating systems, Exchange
server software and vendor software are
installed to replicate the data.
Additionally, software agents must be
installed and maintained on both the primary
Exchange server and on all of the
desktop/laptop computers of the e-mail user
community.
The agent software can be destabilizing
to both the Exchange server and the e-mail
infrastructure. Plus, the ongoing
maintenance to patch and update both the
server and desktop/laptop client agents can
be cumbersome and time consuming.
RISK OF E-MAIL DATA LOSS
These software solutions blindly
replicate the data at the block or file
level, so they also replicate data
corruption, which is a common failure cause
of downed e-mail servers. Furthermore,
failover is not immediate, and failback can
result in e-mail data loss, which is a risk
most organizations cannot afford.
Lastly, software replication solutions
can also be out of the reach of smaller IT
departments because installation is complex
and ongoing maintenance can double or even
triple the overall IT workload.
Hosted disaster-recovery solutions, as
the name implies, replicate e-mail across
the Internet. While they require fewer
ongoing IT resources than clustering or
replication solutions, they can be
expensive, and they do not provide recovery
from a corrupt database, which can occur two
to three times per year. Hosted
disaster-recovery solutions also take two to
four days to install, and can put
potentially destabilizing software agents on
all e-mail severs and on the
desktops/laptops of the e-mail users.
These solutions offer no
high-availability support for LAN failover
caused by a local server failure. They are
used for disaster-recovery scenarios when
the entire site where the primary server
resides goes off line. Furthermore,
transparent support for mobile devices and
continuity for complete Outlook client
functionality is generally not available.
International legal and financial
services organizations, which have high
levels of messaging activity at all hours of
the day, are examples of the companies most
challenged by continuity planning. Their
e-mails often contain proprietary and
critical communications, such as contracts
or portfolio information, and they rely
heavily on the accuracy of time and date
stamping.
These types of companies often have fewer
employees than companies in other industries
with comparable revenue, so their IT staff
may be small. Therefore, adding task burden
to the already time-consuming support of
their e-mail ecosystem is unacceptable.
The key to selecting a continuity
solution is outage avoidance. This means
that the solution must assure protection
against both local server failure and a full
site outage for the application and all of
the data. A new approach to e-mail
continuity for Microsoft Exchange is
low-cost, high-availability and
disaster-recovery application continuity
appliances.
EASY TO INSTALL
These appliances are essentially
"plug-and-go" because they take less than 20
minutes to install, require no special
training or IT expertise to operate, and
require no ongoing maintenance. The
appliances are remotely monitored, patched
and maintained by the vendor's network
operations center. These appliances provide
instant failover, protect MS Exchange both
locally in the event of a server outage and
remotely for disaster recovery in the event
of a full site outage (the data remains safe
within the security of the company's
network).
Disaster-recovery application continuity
appliances enable companies to deploy
comprehensive, cost-effective e-mail
continuity by protecting mission-critical
Microsoft Exchange servers. They assure 24/7
end-user e-mail continuity for both the
Exchange application and corporate e-mail
data, in the event of planned or unplanned
server or site outages.
When an Exchange server fails or an
entire Exchange site goes off-line, the
appliances will take over e-mail operation
from the downed Exchange server or site. All
e-mail data, from before and during the
outage, is preserved on the appliance and
can be replicated back to the updated,
repaired or replaced Exchange server, while
end-users continue to have full e-mail
functionality and data access.
Some appliance models can support partial
as well as full mail store replication back
to the Exchange server, allowing simple
protection against commonplace site-level
outages such as power or network failures.
They should also transparently handle "split
brain" events from site outages by
automatically reconciling the divergent
Exchange mail stores without any data loss.
Because the Exchange mail store within
the appliances is always operational and
data replication and automatic verification
are continuous, organizations are protected
from discovering mail store corruption at
the time of a disaster. This important
protection is not available, however, from
products that rely on sequential byte-level
replication or log replay technology. These
appliances can be deployed on the LAN for
high-availability protection, or in a remote
site for disaster-recovery protection of the
Exchange server, ensuring application
continuity and data integrity for
mission-critical e-mail communications.
Andréa Skov is vice president of
marketing for Teneros, Mountain
View, Calif.
For more information
(click here)