Hot IT Jobs

Sr. SAP FI/CO Enterprise Specialist (III)

Developer

3rd shift Computer Operator

Ab Initio Consultant in Tampa, FL

Software Engineer

 

 

 


Features

October 2006

CONVERGENCE

Analyze VoIP quality

by Charles Thompson

Maintaining voice-over-IP (VoIP) quality is largely a matter of minimizing network delay and jitter, which is variability in packet arrival time. Codecs require a steady, consistent stream of packets to provide adequate playback quality. Packets arriving too late or out of order will result in jerky, jumbled playback (referred to as jitter).

While the jitter buffer on a VoIP phone can mask mild delay and jitter problems, severe jitter can overwhelm the jitter buffer, resulting in excessive delay.

Another item to monitor is packet loss. Networks tend to either sporadically drop single packets (these periods are called “gaps” in packet loss) or large numbers of packets in a “burst.” Packet loss concealment techniques typically have no trouble handling packet loss during gap periods; sustained bursts are difficult to manage.

Managing VoIP requires hard numbers beyond subjective user assessments of quality. Beyond monitoring the network parameters, having an overall quality score, such as a mean opinion score (MOS) or R-factor score can also be a useful VoIP network health index. VoIP monitoring tools calculate the MOS and R-factor scores using a formula known as the E-model. An analyzer calculates how much the various impairment factors (such as codec, jitter, delay and packet loss) affect the typical user’s perception of call quality.

VoIP quality may be degraded when any of the following conditions arise: MOS score falls under 3.5; R-factor score drops below 70; or unidirectional delay exceeds 150 ms.

When a user cannot get a dial tone or there are excessive delays in ringing the other party’s phone, VoIP performance is unacceptable. Examining a display that shows how the call is progressing between the parties and the call manager or gateway can reveal the problem. A connection dynamics display (also known as a ladder diagram) highlights which party is not responding or which party is responding slowly. Having this capability can dramatically cut down troubleshooting time.

Metrics can provide a good indication of current VoIP performance. An analysis tool that tracks, stores and analyzes long-term activity will define what is considered normal for a particular VoIP environment. This insight will help you intelligently configure alarms on the monitoring tool to notify you when VoIP performance deviates from the norm–allowing you to become aware of problems as they arise so you can immediately resolve them.

If you have not deployed VoIP on the network yet, baselining activity is crucial to determine how the network will handle the new traffic and what changes need to be made to effectively support VoIP communication.

An analyzer that can provide detailed insight into VoIP communication is needed to successfully manage VoIP, as the monitoring tools that come standard with the VoIP equipment may not be adequate. An analyzer that can detect and resolve audio problems, provide
real-time call detail records, and display VoIP connection dynamics is the
best option.

Charles Thompson is manager of sales engineering for Network Instruments, Minnetonka, Minn.

For more information:
www.rsleads.com/610cn-260